HIGH QUALITY, HARD TO GET AND CUSTOM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS FOR POWER SUPPLIES, DISPLAYS, TVs, MOTHERBOARDS AND MORE!

Power supply evaluation methodology

Discuss the Reviews and Articles on hardwareinsights.com here!

Re: Power supply evaluation methodology

Postby LongRunner » May 19th, 2015, 4:24 am

That seems fair. It seems that, because so few reviews include hold-up time tests, the manufacturers haven't paid much attention.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Power supply evaluation methodology

Postby Behemot » May 19th, 2015, 5:19 am

Well it has two sides, they of course save money on smaller input bulk caps. But the capacitance itself also makes it more difficult for the PFC block to keep PF high as it moves it the old-fashioned way (like any other capacitance/inductance) so you can notice talk about how small bulk cap you can use in every PFC controller datasheet.
User avatar
Behemot
Administrator
 
Posts: 449
Joined: November 28th, 2014, 8:57 am
Location: CZ

Previous

Return to Content Comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests